|
branding, andrevan, brand, fuckwikipedia encyclopedia reference, abusive, 2 pac music video, aquaponics, gridlock, poisonous, civil rights, thug, donna powers, personal essay, craig coyne, thug life, | percentage points from 2003-2004 compared tupac shakurs picture to 0.4 points for 2002-2003. The broader context tupac shakurs picture is exactly the opposite of what you have claimed. Poverty has declined significantly over the past half-century. That decline has not been steady, tupac shakurs picture there are a number of periods where the rate went up, but the overall trend is clear. The US has slipped since 2000, but that slip is, put into historical context, quite small. [ ...reply just to this | comment on the story... | next new ] 29. Check your logic by Catch22 at Wed 31 Aug 11:02amscore of 1.5 |
Best Mature Paysites
|
Re: Check your math by zyxwvutsr at Wed 31 Aug 10:38amscore of 2 nuanced in reply to comment 22 However, whatever time frame you want to pick, the record is bad...Looking in a broader context the trend is both clear and clearly bad whatever time frame you want to choose That is absolutely false. The 2004 rate is andrevan the same as in 1998, is lower than in any year between 1980 and 1997, is well below the overall historical average (14.2%), and the 1990s andrevan average (13.8%). The 12.7% rate andrevan is also lower than the average rate for 60% of any of the four-year periods you can choose from 1960 on. As far as four-year increases go, the percentage increase from 2000-2004 (1.4 percentage points) is not particularly large. The four-year trend ending in 1993 was up 2.3 percentage points, and the trend in 1982 was up 3.6 percentage points. You may also have noticed that the rate of growth in poverty is slowing — up 0.2 |
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now |