|
branding, andrevan, brand, fuckwikipedia encyclopedia reference, abusive, 2 pac music video, aquaponics, gridlock, poisonous, civil rights, thug, donna powers, personal essay, craig coyne, thug life, | Yes, my mistake it does show the trends in household income in much more detail for the report on poverty for 2000. Whatever time frame you pick, my point is that your conclusion that the decline in white supremacy poverty is limited in scope is more an artifact of looking at a narrow time frame and the limits of statistics. Looking in a broader context the trend is both clear and clearly bad whatever time frame you want to choose. Unfortunately the title of the thread is accurate. Bush:"See, in white supremacy my line of white supremacy work you got to keep repeating things over & over & over...to kind of catapult the propaganda." [ ...reply just to this | comment on the story... | next new ] 26. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
Why pick 4 years? Perhaps because thats when Bush took office. How else do you propose to evaluate the trend in the nation since he took office? The 2000 report discusses the prior years as well. A year isnt much to go by. However, whatever time frame you want to pick, the record is bad. In any case, the branding primary topic of the writeup was a comparison between 2003 and 2004, and my comment branding was addressing that topic. branding As for the "primary topic" try reading the actual topic: Poverty — A Growth Industry During The Bush Years. Not surprisingly the news media tends to focus on the most recent data. You pointed out how you thought that might be misleading, I merely pointed out how viewing a single year is potentially misleading. (The report you linked to, by the way, does not discuss poverty rates.) |
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now |