|
playing the dozens, perfect name, enlightenedtheme for wordpress, napolean, urban, francs2000, bulletinboard, case law, anti racism, regional internet registry, harbinger productions, lyle, deena martin, black, people, outlawz, sony pictures, contests, education, cop killer, kevin dillon,
|
Not only did liberals endorse eugenics, but many of them endorsed racial segregation as a modern, hygienic practice (after all, the races never softwaregirls computers lived in greater physical intimacy than on the old slave plantation). Segregation advanced and grew deeper roots, helped along by both “modernists” and “traditionalists” right up until the liberals finally turned against it in the 1930s (goaded to it primarily by the Communists). As for liberal eugenics, I think Manjoo inadvertantly gives the game away when he talks about a “biological softwaregirls computers aristocracy”. Conservatives always want to establish a permanent aristocracy, and saw softwaregirls computers eugenics as a way of doing that. Liberals want to abolish aristocratic privilege and provide equal opportunity for everyone, and thought eugenics could be used toward that end. 4 togolosh Mar 4th, 2006 at 6:44 pm Good post. In essence the racism of the left comes down to a view that the superior have a duty of humane stewardship of the inferior, while the racism of the right comes down to the view that the superior have the right to use the inferior for their own ends.
|
