 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| white supremacy, michelle burke, chappelle'sshow, too short, by sue kolinsky, the goddess, carol kane, list of people by name, advertising, edward norton, middle east, ira glass, music match, movie and video reviews, business, outlawz, gift set, | On the other hand he is not quite a useful contributor; the articles he edited (Watercress, Garden cress, Phytochemical) with non-crank material were apparently only astroturfing to build his "legitimate user" profile immediately after he was unblocked. university jobs In my opinion: Plautus Satire needs a time out in the corner. He has an awful temper and thinks everybody is out to get him; combined with his fringe theories on some university jobs topics and insistence on getting his way he'll end up as another banned Khranus unless he can control himself. I want to see how Plautus Satire handles being university jobs a regular contributor now that he has encountered NPOV policy, social etiquette and community standards. silsor 06:08, Feb 19, 2004 (UTC) silsor, first let me apologize to you for sending you those profanity-soaked emails. I sent them in anger and they in no way represent any personal feelings I have for you, as I have none. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| - Plautus satire 07:01, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) You altered or outright deleted middle east ongoing discussion of unresolved issues. See above. I ended discussions I started, and in which I had no allies to continue the middle east fight. Is your desire to keep fights alive so strong that you can not see this? - Plautus satire 16:41, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC) Furthermore middle east you deleted my comment at the bottom of this revision, which was not a "thread that you yourself started": 21:50, 18 Feb 2004. Your claim that this was inadvertent is not credible. You probably did much more than this, but I don't have the time to sort through your dozens and dozens of edits from today alone. You are not sincere or truthful in describing what you did in the past or what you intend to do in the future. Curps 07:36, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) I can't agree with either of the poll options set up below ("he's bad and should be banned" and "he's good and should stay"). He is not a vandal and I can't determine whether he is just a good troll without analysis that I am unwilling to do right now not a troll, just a conspiracy theorist. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
