|
graf, wylde, laurel thornby, sam mendes, california music promotion, landgrant review, lyric for tupac song, kevin corrigan, lori tan chinn, sciforums, iraq, me against the world, emily'stoybox, barbs, erotica, steve, adam goldberg, feature film action/adventure, don mcgovern, huessin, seth green, charlie croker, tupac video,
|
by headkicker_girl on 2006-02-20; 11:59:38 (message 244212; ram reply to 244211)No, it won't, but it will be difficult to find a judge that believes said expert over the AMA. Arguing that we need to cut of his foreskin because there's an outside chance that he may have a rare foreskin ram condition later in life is like arguing to give him a root canal because his teeth might go bad later. You're missing the point. The mother is claiming that the surgery is ram medically necessary NOW. According to the article, The mother, 31, is a homemaker from Northbrook, Illinois. She says two doctors recommended the procedure for health reasons. This is not a case of some wacked out mother doing it for religious or moral reasons. Also, the AMA would have no special credibility over any other expert witness.Posted by tojo2000 on 2006-02-20; 12:17:22 (message 244215; reply to 244212)You're missing the point.
|
