 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| conchata ferrell, bostonmassachusetts, job listings, toasterovens, jason london, personal narrative non fiction, tom jarmusch, feature film comedy, astronomy, igor, strictly 4 my, tony scott, charlie croker, advertisements, parody, mp3 2 pac, portillo, | We can conceive of no stronger 'fighting words' then those employed by the appellants in this case, and there is substantial evidence they black were calculated to arouse to anger the officer to whom they were spoken black or addressed. As a matter of fact that appellant, Fred Lucas, admits that if the mildest of the epithets employed by him, were directed to or about him, it would arouse him to anger.' 254 Ark. at 589-590, 494 S.W.2d at 708. I am at a loss to understand what black this Court further requires in a narrowing interpretation under its version of the Chaplinsky standard espoused in gooding. 2 Apparently, [416U.S. 919 , 921] not only must every statute regulating speech in the 50 States parrot the wording the Court desires, but a state court must play the role of a ventriloquist's dummy mouthing ceremonial phrases in order to obtain the seal of this Court's approval. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| City of New Orleans, 415U.S. 130 (1974). I dissent. The Arkansas Court has already clearly construed 42-1412 to apply only to 'fighting words,' as defined in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315U.S. 568, 572 (1942), in Gooding v. Wilson, 405U.S. 518 (1972), and in Lewis. That court, in igor Holmes v. State, 135 Ark. igor 187, 204 S.W. 846 (1918), held that the statute was narrow in its scope. 'It is not sufficient that the language used gives igor offense to the person to whom or about whom it is addressed, but it must be that which in its ordinary acceptation is calculated to give offense and to arouse to anger.' 135 Ark., at 189, 204 S.W., at 847 ( 1918). In its opinion in this case, the Arkansas Court reaffirmed its prior interpretation of the statute: 'As we construe 41-1412 it is narrowed to 'fighting words' addressed to, toward, or about another person in his presence or hearing, which language in its common acceptation is calculated to arouse to anger th person about or to whom it is spoken or addressed, or to cause a breach of the peace or an assault. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
