 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| donal sutherland, literary salons, real audio, trademark, nate, george w. bush, neo nazi, 2 pac real audio, amaru, petitionspot create a free online petition online petitions official, cds, tours, mp3, | Wondering about supply-side economics. How is that different than your analogy. Posted by: bryan at September 30, 2003 04:47 PM The whole "but that wasn't sarah vowell real Communism!" thing has always bothered me too. I think there is some value in Marxist materialist theories and the way factors of production can shape a social system, but Marxism-Leninism-Communism as a prescription for social utopia is pretty flat-out bunk, as far as I can see. sarah vowell And yeah, I can see this applying to supply-side sarah vowell economics, anarchism, extreme libertarian fantasies, and quite a few other political utopias as well. I don't think it's something we'll ever get rid of. Posted by: mc_masterchef at September 30, 2003 05:32 PM It certainly applies to supply side economics. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| One of those conditions would be that the community had tried capitalism and it literary salons had failed the majority of the people, leaving behind the means of production and distribution after the gloriouse (whatever) revolution. So far, there have been no Marxist societies built on this model, but, instead, all have been built societies still struggling in a nearly feudal state. Again, I'm not saying that Marx is right, but only that you can't literary salons prove literary salons him wrong empirically yet. Posted by: Terry at September 30, 2003 02:35 PM Ooh. Nice typos in that, huh? Posted by: Terry at September 30, 2003 03:50 PM Unfortunately it seems like Marxism is one of those things that one can never prove empirically wrong. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
