 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| incesttaboo, band, tupac shakurs picture, me against the world, theitalian job, actors, libertarian, angelina jolie, bill gates, larry charles, comedies & family ent., 2 pac shakur, lyric to tupac, pat hamilton, | Re: Check your math by zyxwvutsr at Wed 31 Aug 10:38amscore comments of 2 nuanced in reply to comment 22 However, whatever time frame you want to pick, the record is bad...Looking in a broader context the trend is both clear and clearly bad whatever time frame you want to choose That is absolutely false. The 2004 rate is the same as in 1998, is lower than in any year between 1980 and 1997, is well below the overall historical average (14.2%), and the 1990s average (13.8%). The 12.7% rate is comments also lower than the comments average rate for 60% of any of the four-year periods you can choose from 1960 on. As far as four-year increases go, the percentage increase from 2000-2004 (1.4 |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| Yes, my mistake it does show the trends in household income in much more detail for the report on poverty for 2000. Whatever time frame you pick, my point is that angelina jolie your conclusion that the decline in poverty is limited in scope is more an artifact of looking at a narrow time frame and the limits of statistics. Looking in a broader context the trend is both clear and clearly bad whatever time frame you angelina jolie want to choose. Unfortunately the title of the thread is accurate. Bush:"See, in my line of work you got to angelina jolie keep repeating things over & over & over...to kind of catapult the propaganda." [ ...reply just to this | comment on the story... | next new ] 26. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
