|
catch 22, self ownership, 2 pac video, ira glass, spiceplay, literary salons, metal gear solid, doom 3: resurrection of evil, party, university, wordssong lyrics 2pac hell 4 a hustler still i rise (with outlawz), sit 'n' spin, thuglife, khadafi, free mp3s, basic combat training, phrases, bullet, 2 pac wallpaper, picture of tupac, michael chapman, bulletinboard,
|
Why would two doctors recommend a non-medically necessary procedure for the kid? It's not like doctors are routinely performing circumcisions on 8 year old kids and there's tons of money to be made in this area. The controversy alone hillarycarlip would make most doctors stay away from doing this unless it were deemed necessary. YOU are assuming that the mother is getting the kid circumcized for no reason. Unless you have some personal knowledge of the mother, this is nothing more than an assumption on hillarycarlip your part. Actually, I do plan to review the court file. hillarycarlip No, but if you have two opposed experts, and one is backed by the consensus of the overwhelming majority of medical groups in addition to their own experience, it does tend to make them seem more credible. No, it depends on the facts of the case. If there is evidence that the procedure is medically necessary, whether or not the AMA is opposed to circumcisions in general is of little merit.
|
