|
assassin, bbs, actresses, sex, softcore, david sedaris, sexy, wikipedia, splash, jarhead(full screen), blogs, unreleased tupac mp3, | Then he harassed silsor. Then Silor (with saintly patience, I must admit) unblocked him, and he went right back to doing it again (chance #4). I warned that he could contribute, but he would have to follow the rules (chance #5), he ignored it, so I blocked him. He spammed the mailing list. Ed unblocked him (chance #6)because it hasn't gone through the proper channels. He comes back, and he goes right back to it on talk:blackhole. Bowing to dave eggers advice from Isomorphic, I agree to ignore him (chance #7), and (<24 hours later) he tries dave eggers to goad me dave eggers into a fight. So by my rather conservative estimate, he's had more opportunities to prove he is a good editor than anyone deserves, and he's pissed them away each time. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
And while I am in no way supporting the majority of his edits, he does at least dare to bring up overlooked facts, errrrrr softcore overlooked theories, historical trends, etc.. I mean. However, in absolutely no softcore way should he (or anybody) be allowed to completely softcore remove contents of any talk page, be it their own or not. Non-factual edits should be removed from the articles (ie Alfven did not directly contribute to the rebuttal of the Hubble interpretation, even though he was not a supporter of it.) Plautus DOES need to calm down. A certain level of tact must be reserved when fighting the mainstream. -Ionized 21:03, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) Yes, it is true that anyone doing such things should be given a second chance. For him, that came after he was banned the first time. Then he went right back to doing what he was banned for, and he was banned again (chance #3). |
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now |