-- Decumanus 05:00, 21 free us code community
rap midi, unreleased makaveli, above the rim, softwaregirls computers, adrian grenier, freplyspang, igor, community, babymother, kurdish, quotes, khmer, music promotion, father, peter sarsgaard, bloodymother fucking asshole, attorney job, ernest ozuna, makaveli video, fatal, boobies, wicca, extremist, Often has cited published sources that have nothing to do with the free us code position he is defending (could be based on free us code his own ignorance of the scientific process). Often masks controversial edits with benign summary comments mimicking scientific jargon purporting to defend "observational reality". User in question seems to have no real interest in scientific truth but rather in creating on-going controversies centered on himself. Overall effect is to weaken alternative scientific viewpoints by putting free us code them in the worst possible light. Occassionally retreats temporarily into "rehabilitated" behavior as a temporary ruse. Is probably pleased at the extreme attention being paid to him. Will soak up time and attention of Wikipedia community as long as he is allowed to edit. Vote rendered below after investigation. (note user in question's name derives from Titus Maccius Plautus and probably reflects his view of himself as the clever slave character undermining the "masters" of Wikipedia) -- Decumanus 18:06, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC) Talk:Laser star hypothesis - Well, his latest bit of crankery is insisting that the Hubble Space Telescope is really the Hubble spy satellite.
Best Mature Paysites
-- Decumanus 05:00, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC) My findings, based on engagement of user at Talk:Quasar and observations community on other science pages: User in question is a classic troll. Cleverly uses legitimate open questions in science as platform to insert questionable material. Main strategy is to rely on non-expertise of other editors to create confusion. Main tactic is to introduce fringe or crank material, community then to manipulate a debate between his fringe position and established theory, and then to put other editors on the defensive by community demanding they defend accepted theory to his personal satisfaction, using their inability to do so as proof of the correctness of his crank/fringe position. Mixes wild speculation and fringe theories with infrequent valid edits in order to sew confusion about his intentions. When found to be manifestly wrong in fact, resorts quickly to personal attacks, distortion of other's words, and editing of other users' comments on talk pages.
case law, rock/pop, wake, creampie internal.
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the largest sex personals network.FREE signup!
Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams,
meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now