Then he went right culture: society katherine randolph

spoken word, katherine randolph, tom dicillo, drowned in sound uk, models, insultingpostcards, moviedatabase, makaveli lyric, true stories, quotations, writing, boobs, there goes the neighborhood, steve, catch 22, lyric to tupac, hardcore, sit and spin, 2pac, generation terrorists, punk, rap mp3 z, adrian grenier, graffiti, I do not know him, nor did I ever receive answers from my expressions of sympathy for him/her, but I culture: society can see from the Iridology talk page culture: society (Iridology currently blocked without edit wars) that yes, (s)/he can really help blocked issues advance. Happy editing - irismeister 16:38, 2004 Feb 21 (UTC) I have seen no evidence that Plautus is a "problem user". Lirath Q. Pynnor Plautus satire is not currently a culture: society useful contributor, but has enough potential that we ought to seek a middle ground Isomorphic 06:54, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) See above. Only if he will accept a limitation which requires avoiding articles in any way related to his conspiracy theories, except where those articles (like the Apollo Moon Landing conspiracy theory article he also edited, as 24.79.3.230) are clearly labelled as such. Jamesday 09:03, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) Changed because of subsequent behavior: looks like attention-getting trolling. Jamesday 03:56, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC) Cyp 09:15, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) JDR 11:20, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) [mabey, if qualification to his edits are possible to explicitly satate that such theories are not widely held (I have seen the "death ray" - shuttle thing; conspiracy theories are noteable (if only to be refuted))] ...
Best Mature Paysites
Then he went right back to doing what he was banned for, and he was banned again (chance #3). Then he harassed silsor. katherine randolph Then Silor (with saintly patience, I must admit) unblocked him, and katherine randolph he went right back to doing it again (chance #4). I warned that he could contribute, but he would have to follow the rules (chance #5), he ignored it, so I blocked him. He spammed the mailing list. Ed unblocked him (chance #6)because it hasn't gone through the proper channels. He comes back, and he goes right back katherine randolph to it on talk:blackhole. Bowing to advice from Isomorphic, I agree to ignore him (chance #7), and (<24 hours later) he tries to goad me into a fight. So by my rather conservative estimate, he's had more opportunities to prove he is a good editor than anyone deserves, and he's pissed them away each time. →Raul654 21:11, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) ok, Id like to simply retract my vote then :) -Ionized 22:32, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) (I've added strike comments to show this →Raul654) I'm sorry to break the current consensus, but I'm afraid I have to say this: Plautus satire did contribute to the Iridology talk page in a constructive and absolutely refreshing, knowledgeable manner.
nancy allen, nude, dr. jennifer melfi, police
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the largest sex personals network.FREE signup!
Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams,
meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now