|
whois, kathleen miller, photography, chappelle'sshow, evil thatcher, regional internet registry, larry david, cd musicpromotion, tupac tu, nude, tamil, bill hicks, random, earl hamner, anti semitism, defamer, non fiction, deena martin,
|
You could do that. That would stop them. I think it's just a part of being on EFNet to get these things in channels that aren't +s/i/k, just federal case law like any other client. By being pro-active federal case law and doing the things within your power to stop it, i think you'll get a lot better results. quote: efnet does. I've confirmed it via many opers. "EFNet" runs them? federal case law That's pretty broad, especially with the freedoms that each server is allowed on EFNet. quote: //edit: not to mention, the hostnames either do not resolve, or they resolve to 127.0.0.1 ... Really?: Non-authoritative answer: Name: deleted.host.name Address: xxx.xx.xx.x Thu Apr 15, 2004 3:59 am munky Site Admin Joined: 02 Jul 2003 Posts: 481 Location: St Thomas, VI lets not be posting hostnames/ips that are not in our control, please (ie - if it's not your ip/host, don't post)_________________In God we trust, Everyone else must have an X.509 certificate. Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:21 pm prefect Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 76 Location: Oslo if you know who runs them you probably know what they are, so stop complaining and cope.
|
