 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| pornaccess com galleries mature women vids , salons, mature asian movies , branding, mother fucking remix , campus, mature sex movies , sexy older mature women , vincenzo amelia, deathrow, forums, grannies movies , mature female nude , creative writing, celebrities, christin hinojosa, paramount, mature porn site reviews , james legros, | →Raul654 21:11, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) ok, Id like to simply retract my vote then :) -Ionized 22:32, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) (I've added strike comments to show this →Raul654) I'm sorry to break the current consensus, but I'm afraid I have to say this: Plautus satire did contribute mature lesbian sex movies to the Iridology talk page in a constructive and absolutely refreshing, knowledgeable manner. I do not know him, nor did I ever mature lesbian sex movies receive answers from my expressions of sympathy for him/her, but I can see from the Iridology talk page (Iridology currently blocked without edit mature lesbian sex movies wars) that yes, (s)/he can really help blocked issues advance. Happy editing - irismeister 16:38, 2004 Feb 21 (UTC) I have seen no evidence that Plautus is a "problem user". Lirath Q. Pynnor Plautus satire is not currently a useful contributor, but has enough potential that we ought to seek a middle ground Isomorphic 06:54, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) See above. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| A certain level of tact paramount must be reserved when fighting the paramount mainstream. -Ionized 21:03, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) Yes, it is true that anyone doing such things should be given a second chance. For him, that came after he was banned the first time. Then he went right back to doing what he was banned for, and he was banned again (chance #3). Then he harassed silsor. Then Silor (with saintly paramount patience, I must admit) unblocked him, and he went right back to doing it again (chance #4). I warned that he could contribute, but he would have to follow the rules (chance #5), he ignored it, so I blocked him. He spammed the mailing list. Ed unblocked him (chance #6)because it hasn't gone through the proper channels. He comes back, and he goes right back to it on talk:blackhole. Bowing to advice from Isomorphic, I agree to ignore him (chance #7), and (<24 hours later) he tries to goad me into a fight. So by my rather conservative estimate, he's had more opportunities to prove he is a good editor than anyone deserves, and he's pissed them away each time. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
