 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| anti fascism, minority, literary salon, 504 boyz, blog, rap lyric, zoe, alice poon, speech, sam mendes, | Jamesday 08:51, 19 Feb christin hinojosa 2004 (UTC) I have suggested on his talk page that he should consider moving to areas of Wikipedia where his views will be christin hinojosa less controversial. I hope that he will take this advice. Isomorphic 08:58, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) [edit] New information Unfortunately it's now apparent that Plautus has rejected your advice and instead starting making edits to several pages, including Big Bang, Talk:Big Bang, September 11, 2001 attacks, Apollo moon landing hoax accusations and now more inflammatory comments left on Raul654's talk page. --SheikYerBooty 21:37, Feb 19, 2004 (UTC) Balanced against the optimistic hope of any potential contribution that Plautus satire may make in the future is the fact that he is making a net negative contribution at the moment. He has taken up an enormous amount of person-hours of other people's time that could have otherwise been spent on more productive contributions rather than cleaning up his messes. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| The rewording appears intended to support the notion that alice poon it was a beam from the alice poon ground striking the shuttle, also skipping the theory in the SF Chronicle story that it was camera shake during a 4-6 second explosure, which is what the Columbia Accident Investigation Board subsequently concluded. I haven't examined the other two articles where he managed to get pages protected, so I have no view on what happened with them. →Raul654 alice poon seems initially to have missed that IP edit and thought that the later, more innocuous edits were reasonable, so protected the page to the version including them. Subsequent experience and investigation appears to have persuaded →Raul654 that the initial impression was mistaken, for he later blocked Plautus satire. Given the actions so far, and the edit histories and discussions, it's my view that any editing by Plautus satire would need to be limited to articles not relating to his conspiracy theories, for he's demonstrated the desire to subtly distort the facts to support the conspiracy theory he advances and all edits he makes to any related articles will need to be very carefully considered, to eliminate subtle distortions he can point others to as support for those theories. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
