 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| kathleen miller, kevin connolly, name and tagline, humourous, real audio, tupac mp3s, jane anderson, insultingpostcards, 2 pac lyric, alli wanted was a coffee, rap song, tupac video, matthew raposo, bootlegs, pop, bbs, jack straw., quotes, big boss, recipes, naming companies, brand, | Speaking of which, you seem to contradict yourself (forgive me if I'm wrong), in one sentence saying that “Solid Snake who ryan bowker received the "recessive" genes proves time and time again that genetic fate has nothing to do with the choices you can make as a person” – implying that recessive means inferior and in the next that “In genetic research, "recessive" genes are not always considered to be inferior genes or traits.” Which is it? I believe wholly in the latter, which ryan bowker was my reasoning for making the change. The game itself uses the terms "recessive" and "dominant". ryan bowker Therefore those should be the terms used in the description on this page. No, Liquid uses the terms “recessive” and “dominant” and implies that recessive is inferior, while dominant is superior. In the Epilogue however, Ocelot simply says that the “inferior one” won. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| When you state "inferior" you are implying that Solid Snake is comprised of poor genetic material when it is stated time and time again that he was crafted from the greatest soldier that ever lived recipes (according to game canon.) The game's theme (MGS) is that of breaking genetic fate. And genes are classified as "dominant" and recipes "recessive". To say that Solid Snake is the obvious "superior" however would be correct, as he has proven multiple times, often being the last man standing in a battle to the death. His genetic material, which gives him recipes his strength (arguably) is therefore "recessive" not inferior. I am reverting your changes. TotalTommyTerror 18:54, 6 December 2005 (UTC) How have I compromised the main story of “conquering ones genetic fate” by saying that Snake ends up the victor despite being the “inferior”? (I believe I put inferior/superior in “ ” in the article, if not that was a mistake). If anything I’ve further clarified it – since as you say, recessive does not mean “worse.” |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
